Erratum to "Total domination supercritical graphs with respect to relative complements" [Discrete Math. 258 (2002) 361-371]
نویسندگان
چکیده
A total dominating set of a graph G is a set S of vertices of G such that every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by γt(G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set. Let G be a connected spanning subgraph of Ks,s and letH be the complement of G relative to Ks,s; that is, Ks,s = G⊕H . The graph G is k-supercritical relative to Ks,s if γt(G) = k and γt(G + e) = k − 2 for all e ∈ E(H). In Section 4 in [1], it is shown that the diameter of a 6-supercritical graph is 3, 4 or 5. Further 6-supercritical graphs with diameter 4 or 5 are characterized. As a concluding remark a construction of 6-supercritical graphs with diameter 3 is described. However this construction is incorrect. Here we provide a correct construction. Following the notation in [1], if all edges between two independent sets X and Y are present, we say that [X, Y ] is full. For k ≥ 3, let Gk be the graph with vertex set A ∪ B ∪ C ∪ D ∪ {x, y}, where A = {a1, a2, . . . , ak}, B = {b1, b2, . . . , bk}, C = {c1, c2, . . . , ck} and D = {d1, d2, . . . , dk}, and with edge set E(Gk) = {xai | i = 1, 2, . . . , k} ∪ {ydi | i = 1, 2, . . . , k}∪{aibj | 1 ≤ i, j ≤ k, i ≠ j}∪{bicj | 1 ≤ i, j ≤ k, i ≠ j}∪{cidj | 1 ≤ i, j ≤ k, i ≠ j}∪{aidi | i = 1, 2, . . . , k}∪{xy}. Thus, [{x}, A] and [{y},D] are full, each of [A, B], [B, C] and [C,D] is full minus a perfect matching, while [A,D] consists of a perfect matching. The graph Gk is a 6-supercritical graph with diameter 3.
منابع مشابه
Total domination supercritical graphs with respect to relative complements
A set S of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of V (G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number t(G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. Let G be a connected spanning subgraph of Ks;s, and let H be the complement of G relative to Ks;s; that is, Ks;s = G ⊕ H is a factorization of Ks;s. The graph G is k-supercritical relative...
متن کاملA note on total graphs
Erratum: Identification and corrections of the existing mistakes in the paper On the total graph of Mycielski graphs, central graphs and their covering numbers, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 33 (2013) 361–371.
متن کاملTotal domination in complements of graphs containing no K4, 4
We show that the total domination number of a graph G whose complement , G c , does not contain K3;3 is at most (G c), except for complements of complete graphs, and graphs belonging to a certain family which is characterized. In the case where G c does not contain K4;4 we show that there are four exceptional families of graphs, and determine the total domination number of the graphs in each one.
متن کاملDirected domination in oriented hypergraphs
ErdH{o}s [On Sch"utte problem, Math. Gaz. 47 (1963)] proved that every tournament on $n$ vertices has a directed dominating set of at most $log (n+1)$ vertices, where $log$ is the logarithm to base $2$. He also showed that there is a tournament on $n$ vertices with no directed domination set of cardinality less than $log n - 2 log log n + 1$. This notion of directed domination number has been g...
متن کاملGeneralized Power Domination in Regular Graphs
In this paper, we continue the study of power domination in graphs (see SIAM J. Discrete Math. 15 (2002), 519–529; SIAM J. Discrete Math. 22 (2008), 554–567; SIAM J. Discrete Math. 23 (2009), 1382–1399). Power domination in graphs was birthed from the problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible. A set of vertices is defined to b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Discrete Mathematics
دوره 312 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012